What a Judge Should Never Say to a Contestant
In any competitive setting, the role of a judge extends far beyond evaluating performance. Judges serve as representatives of fairness, professionalism, and encouragement. In contexts such as academic contests, talent shows, sports tournaments, and religious events like Quran competitions, their words carry significant weight. What a judge says — or does not say — can profoundly affect a contestant’s experience, motivation, and perception of the event.
This article explores the crucial topic of what a judge should never say to a contestant. It addresses this not to police language arbitrarily but to protect the integrity of evaluations and the dignity of participants. By understanding which comments to avoid, judges can ensure fairness and contribute positively to the overall atmosphere of the competition.
The Judge’s Responsibilities
Before identifying prohibited or inappropriate remarks, it’s important to consider the role a judge is expected to fulfil. A judge must:
- Approach evaluation objectively, using defined criteria and avoiding personal bias.
- Foster a respectful and professional atmosphere during interactions with contestants.
- Provide constructive feedback when required, especially in educational or developmental contexts.
- Uphold the dignity of the contestants, regardless of their performance.
With these responsibilities in mind, let us look into categories of comments that should be avoided by any responsible judge.
1. Subjective or Emotionally Charged Criticism
Judges must refrain from using language that reflects personal emotion, frustration, or dissatisfaction not grounded in objective criteria. Subjective comments can demoralise contestants and reflect poorly on the integrity of the event.
Examples of what not to say:
- “That was terrible!”
- “I didn’t like your performance at all.”
- “Why did you even come here today?”
Such remarks are unnecessarily harsh and overly personalised. They offer no useful feedback and serve only to discourage the contestant. A more appropriate approach would be neutral and focused on specific aspects of performance that did not meet the standard, such as accuracy, confidence, or adherence to guidelines.
2. Comparisons with Other Contestants
Drawing comparisons between contestants can undermine the individuality of each performance and foster resentment or unhealthy competition. It can also suggest favouritism, which damages the event’s credibility.
Examples of what not to say:
- “The previous contestant did much better than you.”
- “You’re not as good as the rest.”
- “You should do it like contestant number five.”
Every participant brings different strengths and limitations, and it is the judge’s role to assess them independently. Referencing another contestant’s performance devalues the effort being evaluated and can sow unnecessary division among participants.
3. Comments that Question Personal Worth or Ability
A judge should never pass judgement on a contestant’s personal qualities, intelligence, or inherent abilities. These kinds of comments are not only unhelpful but potentially damaging to an individual’s self-esteem and growth.
Examples of what not to say:
- “You clearly don’t understand this subject.”
- “You’ll never get better if this is your level.”
- “Maybe this just isn’t for you.”
Such statements cross the line from critique to character judgement. Judges should assess the performance, not the person, and avoid making conclusive or discouraging statements about the contestant’s potential or suitability.
4. Dismissive or Sarcastic Remarks
Sarcasm may be misunderstood or unintentionally offensive, especially in high-pressure environments like competitions. Even light-hearted remarks can be discouraging or belittling if they are not clearly supportive.
Examples of what not to say:
- “Well, that was interesting… I guess.”
- “At least you tried.”
- “That was unique, I’ll give you that.”
Judges are expected to maintain a respectful tone at all times. Ambiguous or mocking language can easily be misinterpreted and undermine a participant’s confidence. Clear, respectful, and evidence-based observations should always be prioritised.
5. Revelations About Scoring or Results
Sharing scores, positions, or results openly in the presence of the contestant or others before official announcements can affect the integrity and fairness of the competition. It can also affect contestant morale and lead to disputes.
Examples of what not to say:
- “You’re currently ranked at the bottom.”
- “You only got two points from me.”
- “I already know you won’t make it to the next round.”
Disclosure of scores or outcomes is usually reserved for formal announcements. Judges must uphold confidentiality and refrain from speculating or revealing private assessments during or after a performance.
6. Cultural, Religious, or Social Commentary
In multicultural or religious events, especially ones involving children and young adults, judges must be particularly careful not to make culturally insensitive or socially divisive remarks. This includes comments on accents, clothing, background, or ethnic characteristics.
Examples of what not to say:
- “Your accent makes it hard to understand you.”
- “People from your area usually struggle with this.”
- “That’s not how we do it in our community.”
Such comments, even if unintended, can alienate contestants and reflect prejudice. Judges should stick to universally accepted criteria and avoid identity-based assessments.
7. Overstepping Educational or Parental Boundaries
In events involving children and youth, it is important that judges do not attempt to discipline or instruct in a way that should be reserved for educators or parents. Their role is limited to evaluating within the context of the competition.
Examples of what not to say:
- “Your parents should have prepared you better.”
- “I don’t think you’ve been attending your lessons.”
- “You need to practise at least two hours a day to be acceptable.”
Such guidance, although possibly well-intentioned, may come across as intrusive and beyond the remit of a judge. It can cause embarrassment or conflict, especially if parents or guardians are present. Judges can express the need for improvement using general suggestions rather than making personal assessments.
8. Displaying Personal Biases or Favouritism
Favouritism – whether real or perceived – can harm the credibility of a competition. comments that hint at personal preference or relationships with contestants can open up the event to criticism and complaints.
Examples of what not to say:
- “I know your teacher and I expect more from you.”
- “I’m always impressed by contestants from your centre.”
- “Hopefully you’ll win this year, finally.”
Professional distance ensures the judging process remains fair and focused on the performance, not any external relationships or expectations. Bias can invalidate results and impact the reputations of organisers and judges alike.
The Impact of Inappropriate Comments
When judges use inappropriate language, the effects can be long-lasting. Participants, especially younger ones, may internalise these experiences and lose motivation to continue. Organisers may face complaints or reputational damage. In religious contexts such as Quran competitions, the added spiritual significance makes respectful engagement even more vital.
It is essential that judges receive adequate training on standards of communication, emotional intelligence, and the psychological impact of their words. Judging should always aim to be transparent, dignified, and focused on encouragement and development — even when highlighting areas for improvement.
Guidelines for Positive and Effective Communication
To maintain professionalism and support contestant development, judges can adhere to a few best practices:
- Stick to the criteria: Base all comments on the rubric or assessment framework.
- Use neutral and supportive language: Avoid emotionally charged or dismissive tones.
- Maintain discretion: Keep feedback private where appropriate, especially if it is critical.
- Focus on improvement: Offer practical suggestions rather than broad criticism.
- Promote respect: Treat every contestant with dignity and courtesy, regardless of their performance.
Conclusion
Judges play a significant role in shaping contestants’ experiences of competitions. More than just scores and rankings, their words contribute to the educational, spiritual, or personal growth journey of participants. By avoiding inappropriate comments and emphasising respectful, objective communication, judges uphold the values of fairness, integrity, and encouragement that lie at the heart of all well-run competitions.
Ultimately, judges should remember that their words are as much a part of their legacy as their decisions — and that language, once spoken, can either build or break a contestant’s spirit.
If you need help with your Quran competition platform or marking tools, email info@qurancompetitions.tech.